Top AI Repos — open-source AI, indexed and scored
Top AI Repos tracks AI repositories on GitHub and answers two different questions about each one: is it moving right now, and would you bet a product on it.
Top AI Repos tracks AI repositories on GitHub and answers two different questions about each one: is it moving right now, and would you bet a product on it.
Enterprise-grade deep research skill for Claude Code with 8-phase pipeline, source credibility scoring, and automated validation. Outperforms OpenAI, Gemini, and Claude Desktop in quality and verification.
| Date | Stars |
|---|---|
| 2026-08-03 | 967 |
| 2026-08-12 | 983 |
| 2026-08-18 | 993 |
| 2026-08-19 | 992 |
| 2026-08-22 | 995 |
| 2026-08-23 | 996 |
| 2026-08-24 | 997 |
| 2026-08-25 | 998 |
| 2026-08-26 | 1001 |
| 2026-08-28 | 1000 |
| 2026-08-29 | 1003 |
| 2026-08-30 | 1005 |
| 2026-08-31 | 1004 |
| 2026-09-01 | 1006 |
| 2026-09-02 | 1007 |
| 2026-09-03 | 1008 |
| 2026-09-04 | 1011 |
| 2026-09-06 | 1013 |
| 2026-09-07 | 1015 |
| 2026-09-08 | 1017 |
| 2026-09-09 | 1018 |
| 2026-09-10 | 1019 |
| 2026-09-11 | 1020 |
| 2026-09-12 | 1021 |
| 2026-09-14 | 1022 |
| 2026-09-15 | 1024 |
| 2026-09-16 | 1026 |
| 2026-09-17 | 1029 |
| 2026-09-19 | 1036 |
| 2026-09-20 | 1050 |
| 2026-09-21 | 1063 |
| 2026-09-22 | 1098 |
| 2026-09-23 | 1126 |
| 2026-09-24 | 1144 |
| 2026-09-25 | 1146 |
| 2026-09-26 | 1148 |
| 2026-09-27 | 1150 |
| 2026-09-29 | 1154 |
| 2026-09-30 | 1155 |
| 2026-10-01 | 1158 |
| 2026-10-02 | 1159 |
| 2026-10-03 | 1160 |
| 2026-10-04 | 1164 |
| 2026-10-05 | 1167 |
| 2026-10-06 | 1171 |
| 2026-10-07 | 1171 |
| 2026-10-08 | 1173 |
| 2026-10-09 | 1175 |
| 2026-10-10 | 1178 |
| 2026-10-11 | 1179 |
| 2026-10-12 | 1182 |
| 2026-10-13 | 1183 |
| 2026-10-14 | 1184 |
| 2026-10-15 | 1186 |
| 2026-10-16 | 1187 |
| 2026-10-17 | 1190 |
| 2026-10-20 | 1192 |
| 2026-10-21 | 1196 |
| 2026-10-22 | 1199 |
| 2026-10-23 | 1198 |
| 2026-10-27 | 1199 |
| 2026-10-28 | 1201 |
| 2026-10-29 | 1201 |
| 2026-10-30 | 1202 |
| 2026-10-31 | 1203 |
| 2026-11-01 | 1204 |
| 2026-11-02 | 1205 |
| 2026-11-04 | 1206 |
Today
+1 stars today
This week
+5 stars this week
This month
+39 stars this month
Momentum
0.0
growth rate 0.42%/day
# Deep Research Skill for Claude Code Enterprise-grade research engine for Claude Code. Produces citation-backed reports with source credibility scoring, multi-provider search, and automated validation. ## Installation ```bash # Clone into Claude Code skills directory git clone https://github.com/199-biotechnologies/claude-deep-research-skill.git ~/.claude/skills/deep-research ``` No additional dependencies required for basic usage. ### Optional: search-cli (multi-provider search) For aggregated search across Brave, Serper, Exa, Jina, and Firecrawl: ```bash brew tap 199-biotechnologies/tap && brew install search-cli search config set keys.brave YOUR_KEY # configure at least one provider ``` ## Usage ``` deep research on the current state of quantum computing ``` ``` deep research in ultradeep mode: compare PostgreSQL vs Supabase for our stack ``` ## Research Modes | Mode | Phases | Duration | Best For | |------|--------|----------|----------| | Quick | 3 | 2-5 min | Initial exploration | | Standard | 6 | 5-10 min | Most research questions | | Deep | 8 | 10-20 min | Complex topics, critical decisions | | UltraDeep | 8+ | 20-45 min | Comprehensive reports, maximum rigor | ## Pipeline Scope → Plan → **Retrieve** (parallel search + agents) → Triangulate → Outline Refinement → Synthesize → Critique (with loop-back) → Refine → Package Key features: - **Step 0**: Retrieves current date before searches (prevents stale training-data year assumptions) - **Parallel retrieval**: 5-10 concurrent searches + 2-3 focused sub-agents returning structured evidence objects - **First Finish Search**: Adaptive quality thresholds by mode - **Critique loop-back**: Phase 6 can return to Phase 3 with delta-queries if critical gaps found - **Multi-persona red teaming**: Skeptical Practitioner, Adversarial Reviewer, Implementation Engineer (Deep/UltraDeep) - **Disk-persisted citations**: `sources.json` survives context compaction and continuation agents ## Output Reports saved to `~/Documents/[Topic]_Research_[Date]/`: - Markdown (primary source of truth) - HTML (McKinsey-style, auto-opened in browser) - PDF (professional print via WeasyPrint) Reports >18K words auto-continue via recursive agent spawning with context preservation. ## Quality Standards - 10+ sources, 3+ per major claim - Executive summary 200-400 words - Findings 600-2,000 words each, prose-first (>=80%) - Full bibliography with URLs, no placeholders - Automated validation: `validate_report.py` (9 checks) + `verify_citations.py` (DOI/URL/hallucination detection) - Validation loop: validate → fix → retry (max 3 cycles) ## Search Tools | Tool | Priority | Setup | |------|----------|-------| | search-cli | **Primary** — all searches go here first | `brew install search-cli` + API keys | | WebSearch | Fallback — if search-cli fails or rate-limited | None (built-in) | | Exa MCP | Optional — semantic/neural search alongside search-cli | MCP config | ## Architecture ``` deep-research/ ├── SKILL.md # Skill entry point (lean, ~100 lines) ├── reference/ │ ├── methodology.md # 8-phase pipeline details │ ├── report-assembly.md # Progressive generation strategy │ ├── quality-gates.md # Validation standards │ ├── html-generation.md # McKinsey HTML conversion │ ├── continuation.md # Auto-continuation protocol │ └── weasyprint_guidelines.md # PDF generation ├── templates/ │ ├── report_template.md # Report structure template │ └── mckinsey_report_template.html # HTML report template ├── scripts/ │ ├── validate_report.py # 9-check structure validator │ ├── verify_citations.py # DOI/URL/hallucination checker │ ├── source_evaluator.py # Source credibility scoring │ ├── citation_manager.py # Citation tracking │ ├── md_to_html.py # Markdown to HTML con
Excerpt of 4,762 characters
Read on GitHub
29
Would you bet a product on this? Bounded 0–100 and slow moving.
matched fp:07edead3666b97d7, desc:scoring