Top AI Repos — open-source AI, indexed and scored
Top AI Repos tracks AI repositories on GitHub and answers two different questions about each one: is it moving right now, and would you bet a product on it.
Top AI Repos tracks AI repositories on GitHub and answers two different questions about each one: is it moving right now, and would you bet a product on it.
This repository is dedicated to summarizing papers related to large language models with the field of law
| Date | Stars |
|---|---|
| 2026-08-02 | 323 |
| 2026-08-12 | 324 |
| 2026-08-18 | 325 |
| 2026-08-19 | 326 |
| 2026-08-20 | 327 |
| 2026-08-23 | 328 |
| 2026-08-25 | 329 |
| 2026-09-04 | 331 |
| 2026-09-20 | 331 |
| 2026-09-21 | 331 |
| 2026-09-22 | 331 |
| 2026-09-23 | 333 |
| 2026-09-25 | 334 |
| 2026-09-29 | 333 |
| 2026-09-30 | 334 |
| 2026-10-05 | 333 |
| 2026-10-06 | 333 |
| 2026-10-10 | 334 |
| 2026-10-26 | 335 |
| 2026-11-01 | 336 |
| 2026-11-03 | 337 |
| 2026-11-04 | 338 |
Today
+1 stars today
This week
+3 stars this week
This month
+5 stars this month
Momentum
7.0
growth rate 0.90%/day
# LLM-and-Law [](https://github.com/zjunlp/ModelEditingPapers) [](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)   This repository tracks papers and resources about large language models (LLMs) in the legal domain. > Daily update 2026-10-30 (cs.CL): scanned all 175 papers on the dated list; added 6 title-deduplicated papers on Brazilian statutory-text tasks, Indian IPR question answering, agent-assisted bar-exam learning, Japanese legal modeling, advice under human-rights/legal constraints, and Arabic statutory retrieval. Category increments: Applications +3, Legal Reasoning Models +0, Legal Agent +1, Legal Problems +1, Data Resources +3, Law LLMs +1, Evaluation +6. HEARSAYBENCH includes concrete legal-recourse constraints, not just generic Constitutional AI; its full collection is not exclusively legal. Generic safety, organizational policies, political opinions, and mathematical uses of “law” were excluded. The archive date follows the dated cs.CL list, not the original submission date. > Daily update 2026-10-27 (cs.CL): scanned all 232 papers on the dated list; added 2 title-deduplicated papers: PatEx-Gym and Can Language Models Learn While They Think? Category increments: Applications +1, Legal Reasoning Models +0, Legal Agent +1, Legal Problems +0, Data Resources +1, Law LLMs +1, Evaluation +2. The first addresses patent novelty examination; the second explicitly evaluates SCOTUS and ContractNLI and is included only under Evaluation. Generic policy ambiguity, privacy safeguards without a stated legal task, software contracts, and non-legal uses of “law” or “judge” were excluded. The archive date follows the dated cs.CL list, not the original submission date. > Daily update 2026-10-26 (cs.CL): scanned all 106 papers on the dated list; added 1 title-deduplicated paper, AusClinBench, with an explicit National Law obligations subset. Category increments: Applications +0, Legal Reasoning Models +0, Legal Agent +0, Legal Problems +0, Data Resources +1, Law LLMs +0, Evaluation +1. The appendix tests health-service advertising permission and a statutory penalty; inclusion is not based on generic clinical policy alone. Answer keys lack independent review, and benchmark scores do not certify legal correctness or clinical-product safety. Generic compliance, incidental copyright notices, software contracts, and non-legal uses of “law” and “judgment” were excluded. > Daily update 2026-10-23 (cs.CL): scanned all 117 papers on the dated list; added 2 title-deduplicated papers on French civil-cassation grounds and the evidence behind RAG copyright-protection claims. Category increments: Applications +0, Legal Reasoning Models +0, Legal Agent +0, Legal Problems +1, Data Resources +2, Law LLMs +0, Evaluation +2. The French resource uses deterministic extraction and language-model baselines, not a new legal LLM. The RAG survey explicitly audits a copyright/ownership subset; its technical endpoints do not determine infringement. Generic privacy, banking procedures, civil-rights history, and document-editing ethics without an explicit legal task were excluded. > Daily update 2026-10-22 (cs.CL): scanned all 137 papers on the dated list; added 6 title-deduplicated papers on English–Mizo judgment translation, dated Norwegian statutory values, legal-factor representations, missing-authority abstention, police-interrogation summarization, and framing effects in legal/consumer-rights advice. Category increments: Applications +3, Legal Reasoning Models +1, Legal Agent +0, Legal Problems +2, Data Resources +3, Law LLMs +0, Evaluation +6. The summarization paper is admitted under the explicit dataset/benchmark rule, not presented as a new legal LLM. Internal police operating-policy conflicts, professional ethics alone, an
Excerpt of 135,005 characters
Read on GitHubWould you bet a product on this? Bounded 0–100 and slow moving.
matched fp:e7521dd5b63899cc, topic:llm