The repository carrying the petition. Seven projects with no baselines read as volume; four with measured results read as contribution.
Part of a five-repository portfolio supporting the endeavor described in the EB2-NIW petition: optimization-driven, system-level decision frameworks — integrating operations research, mathematical optimization and applied AI — for domains where a wrong decision carries systemic consequences. The three pillars are financial stability, healthcare safety and secure digital infrastructure.
| Petition-grade projects today | 7 built (3 core) |
| Verdict | Count is fine — depth is the problem |
"Petition-grade" means: original work, a stated method, real data at a stated scale, a measured result, and a README a reviewer can follow. Counts exclude duplicates, forks of third-party work, retired projects, and asset-only folders.
| Folder | Project | Pillar | Evidence value |
|---|---|---|---|
3-private-credit-data-provenance/ |
Private Credit Data Provenance | Financial Stability | Planned — build this next; strongest single alignment in the workspace |
4-tokenized-fixed-income-analytics/ |
Tokenized Fixed-Income Analytics | Financial Stability | Planned — build this next |
2-filing-intelligence/ |
Filing Intelligence | Financial Stability | CORE — carries a scale claim that is currently unevidenced |
1-contagion-observatory/ |
Contagion Observatory | Financial Stability | CORE — carries a scale claim that is currently unevidenced |
7-portfolio-results-rollup/ |
Measured Results | Financial Stability | Supporting — converts volume into contribution |
1. Private Credit Data Provenance — 3-private-credit-data-provenance/
Extract terms from private credit documents where every extracted value carries a citation back to the source span.
Why it earns its place: Notion structural opportunity #1. Private-credit and alternative-asset data are opaque and non-standardised; valuation is subjective; regulators (Form PF, AIFMD) demand more transparency; AUM is projected toward USD 5tn by 2029. Simultaneously a national-interest argument that writes itself and a commercial thesis.
Target scale: Private credit term sheets (universe to be stated)
2. Tokenized Fixed-Income Analytics — 4-tokenized-fixed-income-analytics/
Measure liquidity, holder concentration, and redemption latency for tokenized debt from on-chain trade data.
Why it earns its place: Notion structural opportunity #2. Bridges the financial-stability and secure-digital-infrastructure pillars, which the petition currently treats as separate. Building it makes the "three pillars, one framework" story true rather than asserted.
Target scale: On-chain tokenized-debt trade data (universe to be stated)
3. Filing Intelligence — 2-filing-intelligence/
Report what CHANGED in a company's SEC risk disclosures since its prior filing, rather than summarising the filing.
Why it earns its place: Carries two of the petition's scale claims. Simulated data underneath a real number is the sharpest RFE risk in the portfolio.
Target scale: 600+ U.S. corporate filings (10-K / 10-Q)
4. Contagion Observatory — 1-contagion-observatory/
Measure which crypto-equity links actually TRANSMIT stress, and simulate what a shock to one asset does to the rest.
Why it earns its place: Carries the asset-count claims. The asset counts are not demonstrable from the repo as it stands.
Target scale: 7,500+ crypto assets and 6,000+ U.S. equities/ETFs
5. Measured Results — 7-portfolio-results-rollup/
One 7-portfolio-results-rollup table per built project: baseline, metric, and out-of-sample performance.
Why it earns its place: Seven projects with no baselines read as volume. Four with measured results read as contribution.
Target scale: All built projects in this repository
3.0-Financial-Ai-Systems/
├── 2-filing-intelligence/
├── 1-contagion-observatory/
├── 3-private-credit-data-provenance/
├── 4-tokenized-fixed-income-analytics/
├── 7-portfolio-results-rollup/
│
│ ── earlier work, promoted out of previous/ ──
├── 6-portfolio-optimization-engine/
└── 5-volatility-forecasting/
Every rebuilt project carries the same skeleton: README.md, src/, data/, results/, tests/, website/.
Earlier and off-theme prior work (dashboards, consumer apps, templates, and other non-endeavor folders) has been moved to a separate
archive-prior-workrepository to keep this repository focused on the endeavor. It remains recoverable from this repository's git history.
- No number without a run log. Anything cited in the petition must appear
in that project's
results/README.mdwith a run date behind it. - No simulated data under a real claim. Sample data lives in
data/sample/, labelled, and is never the source of a cited figure. - Adoption must be documentable — named institutions, dated correspondence, registry statistics. Never an inflated count.
- Third-party and forked code stays labelled and is never counted.
There is no previous/ folder any more. Everything that was in it has been promoted to the top level, so every piece of work in this repository is a first-class folder that can be opened, read and continued.
Nothing was deleted except items the rebuild genuinely supersedes; those remain in git history.
| Folder | What it is | How it may be used |
|---|---|---|
6-portfolio-optimization-engine/ |
Multi-agent portfolio allocation policy. | Prior original work. |
5-volatility-forecasting/ |
LSTM volatility forecasting. | Prior original work. |
Read the third column before citing anything here. Forks of third-party work, duplicates, retired projects and asset-only folders are labelled as such and are not part of the petition's evidence.
Scaffold generated from NIW_Project_Portfolio_and_Gap_Plan.xlsx (sheets: Repo Build-Out Plan, Core Ideas at a Glance, NIW Claim vs Repo Evidence, Notion 创业 Alignment). Structure only — no results are claimed here yet.