Shared, installable engineering infrastructure behind the endeavor. Four rebuilt projects carry it.
Part of a five-repository portfolio supporting the endeavor described in the EB2-NIW petition: optimization-driven, system-level decision frameworks — integrating operations research, mathematical optimization and applied AI — for domains where a wrong decision carries systemic consequences. The three pillars are financial stability, healthcare safety and secure digital infrastructure.
| Petition-grade projects today | 0 original, NIW-relevant projects |
| Verdict | Rebuild around its own name |
"Petition-grade" means: original work, a stated method, real data at a stated scale, a measured result, and a README a reviewer can follow. Counts exclude duplicates, forks of third-party work, retired projects, and asset-only folders.
| Folder | Project | Pillar | Evidence value |
|---|---|---|---|
3-quant-productivity-toolkit/ |
Quant Researcher Productivity Toolkit | Financial Stability | CORE — the only honest route to the downloads claim |
2-llm-eval-calibration-harness/ |
LLM Evaluation & Calibration Harness for Finance | Cross-cutting | CORE — serves the hallucination and verification argument |
1-data-provenance-library/ |
Data Provenance / Lineage Library | Financial Stability | CORE — the through-line of the whole endeavor |
4-risk-portfolio-saas/ |
Risk-Portfolio SaaS Prototype | Financial Stability | CORE — the strongest of the four Notion tool ideas |
1. Quant Researcher Productivity Toolkit — 3-quant-productivity-toolkit/
The Notion 综合性工具 idea shipped as a real, installable package with public download statistics.
Why it earns its place: The credible home for the "LLM agent platform, 2,000+ downloads" claim, which currently has no package behind it.
Target scale: Public registry download statistics
2. LLM Evaluation & Calibration Harness for Finance — 2-llm-eval-calibration-harness/
Grounding, citation accuracy and refusal behaviour evaluation for LLMs applied to finance.
Why it earns its place: Directly serves the hallucination and verification argument in Section 2 of the petition.
Target scale: Public filings and public financial corpora
3. Data Provenance / Lineage Library — 1-data-provenance-library/
Span-level citations from extracted values back to their source documents.
Why it earns its place: Shared infrastructure with the private-credit project in 3.0; provenance is the through-line of your whole endeavor.
Target scale: Shared across repos 3.0 and 5.0
4. Risk-Portfolio SaaS Prototype — 4-risk-portfolio-saas/
The Notion 风控组合SaaS idea built as a working risk-portfolio prototype.
Why it earns its place: Risk tooling maps directly onto the financial-stability pillar. Of the four items in the Notion 综合性工具 section, this is the one to build.
Target scale: Portfolio universes from repo 3.0
5.0-Ai-Engineering-Toolkit/
├── 3-quant-productivity-toolkit/
├── 4-risk-portfolio-saas/
├── 1-data-provenance-library/
└── 2-llm-eval-calibration-harness/
Every rebuilt project carries the same skeleton: README.md, src/, data/, results/, tests/, website/.
Earlier and off-theme prior work (dashboards, consumer apps, templates, and other non-endeavor folders) has been moved to a separate
archive-prior-workrepository to keep this repository focused on the endeavor. It remains recoverable from this repository's git history.
- No number without a run log. Anything cited in the petition must appear
in that project's
results/README.mdwith a run date behind it. - No simulated data under a real claim. Sample data lives in
data/sample/, labelled, and is never the source of a cited figure. - Adoption must be documentable — named institutions, dated correspondence, registry statistics. Never an inflated count.
- Third-party and forked code stays labelled and is never counted.
Scaffold generated from NIW_Project_Portfolio_and_Gap_Plan.xlsx (sheets: Repo Build-Out Plan, Core Ideas at a Glance, NIW Claim vs Repo Evidence, Notion 创业 Alignment). Structure only — no results are claimed here yet.